From: michael <michael-AT-shed.com>
Date: 29 Jun 2009 12:01:05 UTC   (04:01:05 PM in author's locale)
To: xtensionlist-AT-shed.com

OH, and of course, I did forget to spel it rite : PLCbus is the
protocol...

michael

On Jun 29, 2009, at 3:57 PM, michael wrote:

> Hello Patrick,
>
> You had me going for a while...thinking that there was something new !
> But I've been in touch with the PCLbus folks for some time.
> I like the protocol, but have had other items to finish first.
>
> Only one little problem yet is that there is no 110v version of their
> controller and
> that makes it a bit difficult to test from here.
>
> I am keeping it on my todo pile, and will get around to it.
>
> Meanwhile, if'n you're really anxious to play with it, you can use the
> DIY interface to roll your own !
> < www.machomeautomation.com/doku.php/supported_hardware/diy>;
>
> michael
>
>
> On Jun 29, 2009, at 3:17 PM, Patrick Blaya wrote:
>
>> Hello List,
>>
>> are there any plans to support PCLBus ? I understand it is not the
>> same as UPB. The PCLBus are more popular now, they become affordable
>> here in Europe and they offer two way communication, seems like a
>> good
>> improvement on X10. Any plans ?
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> XTensionlist mailing list
>> XTensionlist-AT-shed.com
>> lists.shed.com/mailman/listinfo/xtensionlist
>
> _______________________________________________
> XTensionlist mailing list
> XTensionlist-AT-shed.com
> lists.shed.com/mailman/listinfo/xtensionlist

_______________________________________________
XTensionlist mailing list
XTensionlist-AT-shed.com
lists.shed.com/mailman/listinfo/xtensionlist