The Situationist List

Re: the left jab preceding the right jab: not dress-rehearsal, but last act

From: richard haden <richard_haden-AT-yahoo.com>
Date: 24 Apr 2008 05:32:50 UTC   (11:32:50 PM in author's locale)
To: Situationist <situationist-AT-lists.nothingness.org>

View as plaintext

Ooman of the OH>>MAN tribe,

Bare with me while I try to add a little light on the subject (Perhaps in a scatological sense— a little Sepia instead)

Perhaps it is with my ass or brown eye that I spot and judge thee a follower of the worlds great religions—as cultural artfact of tolerance. I tolerate and console those who wish merely to survive and not live…but in their silence I occupy a grater space of freedom. The Christian and Muslim Religions, by far the least interesting of his or her stories, managed back in the day, through a newly bartering publicist , a lobbying campaign, any corporate tobacco CEO would admire—to launch an improved, streamlined myth to rule the peasantry—to better subjugate, circumscribe and repress with there pre-Birkenstock(ian) sandal. To re-institutionalize and Market a vehicle of greater manipulate-able religious nicotine like substance…To the astonishment of conscience minds (minds eye) we today are constantly reminded of how truly active is the pursuit of that great "Darwin Award". http://www.darwinawards.com/

Oh so easy to atomize through the medium of Ka-Boom; a view of the world how ever it is after the fact.

I am still leaning towards a Univocity or a nominalistic vectoring to avoid the stains. I look for the rot on the root of ….inside. http://users.rcn.com/bmetcalf.ma.ultranet/What%20is%20Univocity.htm If we want to understand Deleuze’s philosophy, it is important to come to terms with his Spinozist Univocity. Or Or that the genus (Bi Pedal) Species (Things with wings that look anthropomorphic) are substance abusing, homeomorhphic, delusions.

Something like that

Richard Haden

——- Original Message ——
From: Andrew oommen <andrewomm-AT-gmail.com>
To: Situationist <situationist-AT-lists.nothingness.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:51:52 AM
Subject: Re: the left jab preceding the right jab: not dress-rehearsal, but last act

You are not arguing with anyone but yourself. none of this disproves any point from before. you are wrong.
For your ignorance, i point you to Reza Aslan, who provides two translations of the same passage from the Koran.

"Men are the support of women [qawwamuna 'ala an-nisa] as God gives some more means than others, and because they spend of their wealth (to provide for them)…. As for women you feel are averse, talk to them suasively; then leave them alone in bed (without molesting them) and go to bed with them (when they are willing).

Men are in charge of women, because Allah has made some of them excel the others, and because they spend some of their wealth… And for those [women] that you fear might rebel, admonish them and abandon them in their beds and beat them [adribuhunna]" (No God but God, pg 69-70) (all authors original notes).

Clearly people interpret different things. Your authors take one extremist translation and call it a pillar holding up the entire religion. This author looks at all sides and looks at its contextual history, not its political "idiocracy" that has existed in Western culture.
Concedingly religion is not the solution to the worlds problems, but nonetheless, it is not this savage beast you paint it as. Your ignorance is so blatant that you don't answer the real arguments i make against your position. i say you are intolerant while calling for tolerance (terrorizing in the name of democracy, etc.). i say that your game theory is antihuman (like capital). i also argue you dont know anything about totalizing critiques (deleuze, debord, etc.). you have only made yourself look like an ass. stop beating your head against the wall and go outside to real a book, because none of these online sources will help you deal with you pathology.

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Christopher Gray <rasputin-AT-teleport.com">rasputin-AT-teleport.com> wrote:

It is Islam, probably be better named "Abyslam". Read the tenets and core. The fundamentalists are not "bad examples" of the religion, nut its "best examples". Fortified reification is not warm'n'fuzzy; it's an abomination of inverted humanness, and casts a murderous shadow o'er authentic living. The triad of reifications from the Middle East are co-dependently wretched at their very common core. They seethed forth from a desertified human geography such that sacrifice, scarcity, hording, and rigid hierarchy permeate them all to varying degrees. They are the practice of death culture.