From: Michael Brady <bradydesign-AT-embarqmail.com>
Date: 26 Mar 2009 14:44:06 UTC   (05:44:06 PM in author's locale)
To: "The Graphics List" <graphics-AT-lists.graphicslist.org>

On Mar 26, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Landry Butler wrote:

> I'm not sure I understand the problem. Is it that increased page
> count will result in a higher cost? If so, how about a lighter
> weight paper, say a 45# or 50# sheet rather than a 60#? You should
> be able to save both $$ and weight there.

I'm not sure the increased cost from the increased page count will be
a significant factor for the client. I was asking for comments or
suggestions about a book size smaller than 8.5 x 11, particularly the
6.5 x 10.5 I am considering right now.

FWIW, I looked at what Robert Bringhurst has to say in "The Elements
of Typographic Style," and he talked about Golden Ratios, etc. The
Fibonacci ratio is close to that.

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady
michaelb-AT-michaelbradydesign.com

----
Message sent by The Graphics List.
Want to be removed?
Send blank email to graphics-off-AT-lists.graphicslist.org