The Graphics List
Re: Less than lettersized
On Mar 26, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
> Hey Michael - You didn't say why or why not you did or didn't factor
> in their reason for the smaller than letter-sized or reasons for a
> non-standard A size either and that has left me curious. Are there any
> issues in their reasoning that needs to be considered? Thanks.
I'm working with an intermediary production manager, not with the
general editor. She didn't go into any long explanation. They just
wanted it a bit smaller.
----
Message sent by The Graphics List.
Want to be removed?
Send blank email to graphics-off-AT-lists.graphicslist.org
> Hey Michael - You didn't say why or why not you did or didn't factor
> in their reason for the smaller than letter-sized or reasons for a
> non-standard A size either and that has left me curious. Are there any
> issues in their reasoning that needs to be considered? Thanks.
I'm working with an intermediary production manager, not with the
general editor. She didn't go into any long explanation. They just
wanted it a bit smaller.
----
Message sent by The Graphics List.
Want to be removed?
Send blank email to graphics-off-AT-lists.graphicslist.org
Previous message in thread | Next message in thread
Thread
Less than lettersized / Michael Brady / 26 Mar 2009
Re: Less than lettersized / Daniel Johnson <johnsond-AT-mail.belmont.edu> / 26 Mar 2009
• Re: Less than lettersized / Michael Brady <bradydesign-AT-embarqmail.com> / 26 Mar 2009
RE: Less than lettersized / "Landry Butler" <landry-AT-strangefish.org> / 26 Mar 2009
Re: Less than lettersized / Michael Brady <bradydesign-AT-embarqmail.com> / 26 Mar 2009
Re: Less than lettersized / Daniel Johnson <johnsond-AT-mail.belmont.edu> / 26 Mar 2009
Re: Less than lettersized / Daniel Johnson <johnsond-AT-mail.belmont.edu> / 26 Mar 2009
Re: Less than lettersized / "Landry Butler" <landry-AT-strangefish.org> / 26 Mar 2009
