The Graphics List
Less than lettersized
A book client told me they wanted a book smaller than letter-sized
(and they weren't thinking of any A-sizes either).
Initially, I suggested 8x10, which after I started working with it
just seemed to be an 8.5 x 11 put on the Xerox machine and reduced a
tad. So I started looking at other proporitons. I noticed that a
height of 10.5 inches, which is smaller than 11, is 21/2 (i.e., the
numerator is a Fibonacci number), so I made the width 6.5 inches,
i.e., 13/2. Just a wee bit narrow, but it does have that .619
Fibonacci ratio. Also, it's 68.25 sq. in, which is close to the same
surface as a 7x10 book.
Downside: it's 73% of the area of 8.5 x 11, so the page count will go
up by roughly 33%, too, which can't be recovered because the excess
paper of the smaller trim will just be discarded as waste. I'm going
to run the cost comparison by them again, but I think that will not be
a big factor and they'll stick with the smaller size.
What do you think of this? Any other ideas?
Thanks.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady
michaelb-AT-michaelbradydesign.com
----
Message sent by The Graphics List.
Want to be removed?
Send blank email to graphics-off-AT-lists.graphicslist.org
(and they weren't thinking of any A-sizes either).
Initially, I suggested 8x10, which after I started working with it
just seemed to be an 8.5 x 11 put on the Xerox machine and reduced a
tad. So I started looking at other proporitons. I noticed that a
height of 10.5 inches, which is smaller than 11, is 21/2 (i.e., the
numerator is a Fibonacci number), so I made the width 6.5 inches,
i.e., 13/2. Just a wee bit narrow, but it does have that .619
Fibonacci ratio. Also, it's 68.25 sq. in, which is close to the same
surface as a 7x10 book.
Downside: it's 73% of the area of 8.5 x 11, so the page count will go
up by roughly 33%, too, which can't be recovered because the excess
paper of the smaller trim will just be discarded as waste. I'm going
to run the cost comparison by them again, but I think that will not be
a big factor and they'll stick with the smaller size.
What do you think of this? Any other ideas?
Thanks.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady
michaelb-AT-michaelbradydesign.com
----
Message sent by The Graphics List.
Want to be removed?
Send blank email to graphics-off-AT-lists.graphicslist.org
Next message in thread
Thread
Re: Less than lettersized / Daniel Johnson <johnsond-AT-mail.belmont.edu> / 26 Mar 2009
Re: Less than lettersized / Michael Brady <bradydesign-AT-embarqmail.com> / 26 Mar 2009
RE: Less than lettersized / "Landry Butler" <landry-AT-strangefish.org> / 26 Mar 2009
Re: Less than lettersized / Michael Brady <bradydesign-AT-embarqmail.com> / 26 Mar 2009
Re: Less than lettersized / Daniel Johnson <johnsond-AT-mail.belmont.edu> / 26 Mar 2009
Re: Less than lettersized / Daniel Johnson <johnsond-AT-mail.belmont.edu> / 26 Mar 2009
Re: Less than lettersized / "Landry Butler" <landry-AT-strangefish.org> / 26 Mar 2009
